Early accessFree during early access: draft a course from your own document in minutes.Try it now →
Sample · fictional dataReport CC-DA-0001 · Sample Co. support library

Training Drift Report: support onboarding library

This is what a Training Drift Audit delivers. Every company, policy and number below is fictional; the structure is real.

46
courses in scope
1,912
instructional claims checked
37
out of date vs. current source
58
without any source

1. Summary

Of 46 support-onboarding courses, 9 teach at least one rule that no longer matches its current source. Two findings are rated P0 because they could lead agents to breach a customer commitment: the P1 escalation window (30 → 15 minutes) and the refund approval limit ($500 → $250). Both are taught in several places, including assessments that currently mark the outdated answer as correct.

Recommendation: fix the two P0 findings within one week via targeted updates (a 3-minute delta lesson for current agents, patched onboarding for new hires), then work through P1 findings over the following month.

2. Scope & method

  • Library: 46 courses (31 SCORM packages, 9 slide decks, 6 wiki pages).
  • Sources: 14 current policies, runbooks and product docs supplied by the client, each with an owner.
  • Method: extract instructional claims (rules, numbers, steps, names); match each to a source passage; classify as supported, out of date, conflicting or unsupported; rate by risk and reach.
  • Review: every P0/P1 finding confirmed by a person against the source.

3. Library health

Grounded claims
89%
Current with sources
81%
Objective coverage
74%
Accessibility basics
66%

4. Findings, highest risk first

RiskFindingWhereSource
P0Escalation window taught as 30 minutes; policy says 15.Onboarding L3, Q14, Scenario 2, wiki job aidIncident policy v15 §4.2
P0Refund limit quoted as $500; policy says $250.Billing basics L2, Q6Refund policy v9 §3
P1Deprecated tool name in 6 screenshots and 2 scripts.Product academy (3 courses)Release notes 4.2
P1No assessment covers the new data-retention rule.Privacy essentialsData retention standard v3
P2Two courses teach different PTO approval steps.Manager toolkit, HR 101Conflict: HR-12 vs manager guide
P3Reading level above target in 9 lessons.Across libraryStyle guide

5. Affected learning objects (P0 example)

Clause §4.2 of the incident policy is taught or tested in 7 objects reaching roughly 480 learners:

  • Lesson 03 narration, paragraph 2
  • Question 14 (marks the old answer correct)
  • Scenario 2, branch B timer
  • Wiki job aid "Escalation card"
  • fr-FR and de-DE lesson 03
  • Team-lead refresher deck, slide 7

6. Remediation plan

  1. Week 1: patch the two P0 rules everywhere they appear; current staff take a 3-minute delta lesson; new-hire onboarding updated in place.
  2. Weeks 2–4: P1 fixes; add an assessment item for the retention rule; replace deprecated screenshots.
  3. Month 2: resolve the PTO conflict with HR; set source owners and review dates for all 14 sources.
  4. Ongoing: re-run the audit after fixes; adopt change detection so the next policy change finds its courses automatically.

7. Limitations

An audit compares training with the sources the client supplies. It doesn't validate the sources themselves, assess legal compliance, or measure on-the-job behavior. Automated matching is reviewed by people, but no review is perfect; the client's experts make the final calls.

Want this for your library?

Limited places for early design partners.